Adidas Has Been Accused Of Poisoning All The Year Round.

A few days ago, Adidas was exposed to harmful chemicals.

However, according to the survey, Adidas is not a two exposure, apparently it is a drug trafficker of a habitual criminal.

Adidas has been poisoned all year round.

In August 2011, Greenpeace released the survey results of toxic and harmful substances in global brand clothing, and found that Adidas, Lining and other international famous brands

In the production process, nonylphenol polyoxyethylene ether (NPE) is used to decompose toxic substances into toxic nonylphenol (NP).

NP is a chemical substance added to the production process, which is harmful to human reproductive health.

Although the substance on clothing can be washed away by water, it will continue to affect the environment and become a health risk factor after entering the water body.

After the NO exposure, Adidas quickly made a clarification and said that it was better than singing. Adidas, in its public statement [3], promised the public that it would eliminate all the toxic and harmful substances in its supply chain and products by 2020 and would take immediate action to eliminate NPE, a nonvolatile polyoxyethylene ether.

Undoubtedly, in this NP incident, Adidas has become a brand that responds to Greenpeace's "non-toxic future".

But after a year, the brand of the "non-toxic future" was slapped in the face and was turned over again.

In October 30, 2012, the headquarters was based

Researchers from an international non-governmental organization in Amsterdam tested 14 outdoor clothing brands including children's and women's clothing, including German brand wolf claw, Adidas, Vaude, and American brand TheNorth Face.

Perfluorinated compounds were found in 14 raincoats and rainpants randomly selected.

The report points out that harmful perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and other substances in perfluorinated compounds are mainly used for waterproofing and antifouling.

These fluorinated compounds are difficult to degrade from the environment and may enter the body through food, air and water.

Recent studies have suggested that these harmful chemicals may lead to a decline in fertility and other diseases of the immune system.

Adidas clarified that it was irresponsible to be accused.

Similarly, after the report of the international non governmental organizations, Adidas quickly came out and clarified it.

But this time it seems a bit flinched, and the bottom is not enough: "all tested products are small in substance and harmless to human body."

Mr. Wang was angry at Adidas's clarification: "is it not harmful to the content of a small amount? Do you not know the snowball effect? Even a little poisonous substance has grown up for a long time. If you wear it for a long time, it will not affect the body. It's really irresponsible for the enterprise to stand up and talk!"

"All clarification is false, and all future promises fairy tales are illusory, because in the face of interests, we are victims of P."

Ms. Lee said consumers.

Insiders said: "clothing harmful substances also need a pition section, after all, China's clothing industry is lagging behind international standards.

Obviously, these material alternatives are also lagging behind.

But last year, companies including Nike and Puma have promised to take action to remove harmful chemicals from their products.

It's just that Adidas's luck is not good. The previous commitment and the reality today are obviously a bit hard, so that the bottom is not enough.

Reporter comments: as consumers, we only care about the cold weather to buy clothes and clothes, but never know which contains harmful substances, and what harm do these harmful substances have? Therefore, we suggest that the law give certain standards, instead of being exposed to foreign exposure all the time, that can only appear backward and ridiculous.